twins studies
The reading and the lecture are both about studies made in twins. The article states that most researchers agree that nurture and nature are important in the development of personality and people’s behavior and provides a few reasons. However, the professor states that she is not convinced that the in the study of identical and fraternal twins, they share the same personality.
First, the reading states that identical twins that have the identical characteristics, frequently show a quite similar behavior and others features, even for those twins that were separated at birth. The professor refutes this point. She states that twins that show similarities in their behaviors is because they have shared a similar environment and parents have treated them with the same things, clothes, likes, and dislikes and not for sharing genes. She adds that any personality could be by environment rather than genetic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-21 | lauren1983 | 40 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | lauren1983 | 40 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- asteroids are good for three reasons 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both abo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, they share the same personality. First, the reading states that identical...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 30.3222958057 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 1373.03311258 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 145.0 270.72406181 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36551724138 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 4.04702891845 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79379301833 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 145.348785872 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 419.366225166 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6081144749 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06452816374 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194904551926 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738221234235 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699031500245 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129513148073 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.000886571935193 0.0443174109184 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.