The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology, dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts, was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most important sites but which left hundreds of other interesting projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
The article introduces the theme of asteroids.
More specifically, the writer discusses about the benefits of colonizing on asteroids.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that since asteroids have low gravity compared to planets, it would be easier to land.
The lecturer, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. he states that there will be also bad consequences related to health if there are low gravity.
The author also claims that asteroids are wealth in precious elements such as gold and platinum. Hence, colonists or businesses that are sponsoring can support and pay even more money.
Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. The speaker holds that even though there are valuable elements, it would be expensive to send them back to earth.
The writer in the reading passage says that it is easy to attain them. For example; some asteroids are closer than our moon, which means that spacecraft even can return from asteroids.
The professor in the listening is skeptical about this. he explains that asteroids are moving from one spot to another. Therefore, even though it could be easy to reach, very likely that spacecraft can return back.
To sum up, both the writer and professor will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-24 | Apolytos | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Umme Abiha | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hello GRE | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hello GRE | 3 | view |
- TPO 34 60
- The history of the United Kingdom 3
- The United Kingdom sometimes referred to as Britain has a long and rich history of human settlement Traces of buildings tools and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years from the Stone Age through the Bronze Age the Iron Age the t 3
- The history of the United Kingdom 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...however, disagrees with this viewpoint. he states that there will be also bad cons...
^^
Line 15, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... the listening is skeptical about this. he explains that asteroids are moving from...
^^
Line 15, column 203, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... reach, very likely that spacecraft can return back. To sum up, both the writer and prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20283018868 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53134057749 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6526719186 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5333333333 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1333333333 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0716749532132 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209934960652 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260864392184 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0261852669901 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269776821629 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.