using the fuel-cell engine to power cars instead of the internal-combustion engine
The material discusses the usage of hydrogen-based-fuel-cell engine to power cars instead of internal-combustion engine. While the reading states that using fuel-cell engines have several advantages, the listening mentions that the reading is correct in pointing out the problems related to using petroleum, but the professor says that the author is very optimistic.
First, the writer posits that hydrogen can not be easily declined and it could be brought from many sources, such as water and natural gas. On the other hand, the lecturer challneges this and states that hydrogen is not easily available. the professor mentions that people could not use hydrogen directly from water, but it should go through complicated process. The listening adds that hydrogen in a pure liquid state is high artificial substance. The speaker explains that it could be produced in a very cool temperature, which is very hard to attain.
Second, The author claims that using fuel-cell engine could solve the world's pollution problems. On the contrary, the lecturer opposes this and states that using hydrogen to power cars is not a realistic way to solve pollution problems. The professor explains that producing hydrogen from water or natural gas needs to burn coals or oil and that could produce lots of pollution.
Third, the reading mentions that using fuel-cell engine is cost-effective. The speaker refutes this and states that it is not necessary for hydrogen to be less costive. The professor explains that the maufacture of hydrogen costs lot money becasue the engine should have platinum metal, which is very expensive. The lecturer adds that without this metal the hydrogen could not do reaction and produce electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | taknam | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-29 | negooo | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | 1ms19ec133 | 80 | view |
- tpo 17 growth population consequences on the number of birds 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to learn about life is by listening to the advice of others. Give specific examples to support your opinion. 77
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific details and examples to support your answer.Students should choose a university that prepares them for high paying careers. 76
- tpo 35 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... that hydrogen is not easily available. the professor mentions that people could no...
^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... using fuel-cell engine could solve the worlds pollution problems. On the contrary, th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...latinum metal, which is very expensive. The lecturer adds that without this metal t...
^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot do reaction and produce electricity.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31135531136 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92572428705 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5774643398 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289524745131 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115769473679 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163971377577 0.0662205650399 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219345719589 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174349901689 0.0443174109184 393% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.