The lecture provides the necessary solutions the could be beneficiary on raising the tuna fish in farm which in turn overweigh the problems attributed in the passage. It is limpid from the lecture that the populations of tuna fish can be increased if the farmers follow the methods illustrated which can make tuna fish business profitable.
Firstly, the lecture refutes the claim made in the passage about the decline of wild tuna. The passage depicts that the young tuna can not lay eggs in the farm under captured condition which would result in reducing the numbers of wild tuna as the farmers will continue the process of catching wild tuna from the sea. But the passage overlooks the fact that injecting hormone to the young female tuna in the farm can capable them for breeding in the farms. These injection does not produce any health risk to tuna and safe for the consumer. Mentioning these facts, the author cast doubt on what is stated the passage about the plummating of tuna population.
Secondly, the lecture rebuts the statement made in the passage about the farmers of being merging into non-profitable status. According to the article, huge amounts of costly small fish are needed to feed the tuna fish that may turn the tuna fish business into non-profitable. However, the lecture says that cheap plants can be a suitable supplement of the expensive small fish. Moreover, the plants are enriched with sufficient proteins and neutrients that would be needed for the proper grow of tuna. Thus, the lecture proves that the speculation of the passage about tuna farming to turn into non-profitable is incorrect.
Lastly, the lecture points out a research on parasite of tuna fish at Southern Australia to invalidate the conjecture made in the passage about the effect of parasite. The parasite can bring deleterious effect on tuna with the process of weaken, growth reducing and even by causing death which is stated in the article. The lecture illustrates results of the research that the tuna farm can get rid off from the parasites by moving these farm into deep water as parasite would die there.
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has b 73
- TPO 66 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 66
- It is more important for student for understanding ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts agree or disagrees 70
- Air purifiers are being used to protect our health from air pollution Many different types of air purifiers have been invented for better effects Here are some of the most widely used air purifiers HEPA filters are effective at removing allergens such as 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would result in reducing the numbers of wild tuna as the farmers will continue t...
^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this injection' or 'These injections'?
Suggestion: This injection; These injections
...capable them for breeding in the farms. These injection does not produce any health risk to tun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...orrect. Lastly, the lecture points out a research on parasite of tuna fish at Southern Au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 357.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9299719888 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54280339089 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2145458805 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277116289942 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112596444202 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553569360257 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18983078289 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323801763836 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.