zoos
The article states that zoos are essential to society and provide reasons for support. However, the professor explains that there are problems with the author's arguments and he doesn't believe that zoos benefit the animals or the society and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that animals are treated well in zoos. The professor refutes this point by stating that the animal treatment at zoos is not pretty. In an incident in a zoo, two red pandas were found dead after being exposed to rat poison. The safety managers could have prevented this, but they were nowhere to be found. This shows lack of care by handlers in the zoo.
Second, the reading claims that the purpose of zoos is educational for visitors. The professor opposes this by saying that people still look at it as entertainment. Majority of animals in zoos are chosen for attracting visitors, not to educate them. These visitors learns a message that in zoos it's okay to use animals. The professor further states that, some zoos do inform important details about animals. However, these exhibits are presented in artificial or misleading way, which belies the purpose of educating the visitors about the animals.
Third, the article avers that zoos contribute in protecting endangered species. The professor contends that this is problematic. He agrees that success in case of Golden Lion Taamar is good. However, zoos have poor success rate in terms of protecting endangered species. Zoos have small number of animals and they interbreed within family, which results as rise in birth defects. Furthermore, he states that zoos present have no advantage to saving endangered species when compared to saving them in their natural habitats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 65 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 33
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 77
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During the time period, most of the com 55
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 66
- Zoos and the lecture "not-in-support" 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...blems with the authors arguments and he doesnt believe that zoos benefit the animals o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'learn'.
Suggestion: learn
...rs, not to educate them. These visitors learns a message that in zoos its okay to use ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: IT_IS[8]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... visitors learns a message that in zoos its okay to use animals. The professor furt...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1338028169 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50043638326 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8269180951 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7368421053 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439682868865 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154482903629 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109858798135 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280126461184 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208494062101 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.