Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is the fundamental pillar of a developed society. From Greeks to Romans to modern times, different Educational institutes in form of schools or Universities have played their part in imparting knowledge and training the young minds to follow their dreams and pursue their field of choice.
Institutes can only help their pupils in making informed choice. They cannot make a decision on behalf of them. Schools open many doors for the kids, showing them a world of opportunities and a universe of possibilities. Students can look at various options and decide their field of choice in which they are interested or feel that they can give something more to their field.
Every field has different requirements, require different level of knowledge, different intelligence. So some students may succeed in some field and some in others but that does not mean we can take away the opportunity from anyone. Take for example a student who has less Intelligence and teachers think he cannot enter Engineering or other fields, If such a kid is really interested, motivated, and hardworking he may succeed and who know he may even reach to great heights in that field. It is well known that Albert Einstein was scolded repeatedly in class for failing in Math. His teacher considered him a failure. But that person rose against odds and scaled new summit in field of Physics. What if he was not allowed to pursue science further in his studies, we would have not got e=mc2 equation which has solved many mind-boggling problems that has baffles physicists and mathematicians for ages.
Educational institutes should allow the students to pursue any field they want. We have entrance examinations in every field which judge a student if he is capable to be in that field or not. Entrance examinations are reasonable but what we cannot do is snatch away that opportunity from a student to appear in them and prove his worth.
At learning age, students are still finding their niche in society and searching for their interests. We cannot judge at that age if a particular person is up to be in this field or not. Freedom of Choice is a fundamental right which each and every one should enjoy to scale different heights.
- Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact', almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in future 80
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate 63
- Analyze an argumentThe following appreared in ma memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Cafe, a small, local offe shop in the downtown area of a small american city:"We must reduce overhead here at the cafe. Instead of opening at 6 a.m. weekdays, we wil 80
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 70
- Question Authority Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world 93
Sentence: Entrance examinations are reasonable but what we cannot do is snatch away that opportunity from a student to appear in them and prove his worth.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to is and snatch
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1808 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.796 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.703 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.348 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.51 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5