The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The line graphs elucidate the amount of fast food consumed by British people from 1970 to 1990.
It is apparent that the preferences of fast food among British citizens fluctuated over 20 years of period. There were similarities in the incremental trends for fish and chips and hamburger whereas pizza showed a detrimental trend.
At the beginning of the period, the UK’s most popular fast food was pizza as they ate about 300 times a year. By contrast, British citizens ate fish and chips 100 times a year while hamburgers for around 50 times a year. The amount of pizza consumption decreased to around 200 times in 1980 whereas the amount of other two fast food categories rose - around 150 and around 100 for fish and chips, and hamburgers, respectively. After 1980, the preferences in fast food reversed; fish and chips became the most popular fast food in the UK whereas pizza was the least popular food. The amount of fish and chips intake rose drastically to reach at its peak of 500 in 1990 while similar growth showed for hamburgers to reach at 300. Meanwhile, pizza had a steady fall throughout the period and recorded at just above 200 times in 1990.
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)Describe the information presented below, comparing results 70
- Employees should be able to work from home more often. 70
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 87
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 12002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 10
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 939 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.626 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.433 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.5 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.468 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.625 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4