TPO3
In this set of material,the author and the professor discusses the doubts about whether some paintings belong to Rembrandt.The reading thinks that a painting portrait a woman with a fur does not belong to this artist, and submit some of reasons to support his idea.However,the listening repudiates what stated in the article and provides three counterclaims proofing that the reasons are not convincing.
First,the speaker states that after X-ray analysis , scientists proof that the color of the woman's fur had been added hundred years later..She thinks may be to increase the value of that painting.But the original colors belongs to Rembrandt.Which casts suspicious of the reading passage.
Second, the professor explains the error of the light shadow illumination by suggestion that that shadow had been added by different artist which had different style than Rembrandt;therefore, the shadow of light was not partial as the article states and the real beneath shado was realistic and belongs to the famous Dutch painter.
Third,the lecture states that when the fur of the woman in the painting had been added ,those howm made it need to add extra woods above the real one.And after examination the scientists proof that the original wood of the painting are made from the same tree of other Rembrandts painting.Which completely refutes what the reading passage suggested.
- Essay topics: Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.---------- 50
- We learn from our experience better than book. 64
- Tpo11 80
- Tpo29 80
- Do you A/D? extended families are not important these days as they were in the past.Give specific reasons to support. 70
and provides three counterclaims proofing that the reasons are not convincing.
and provides three counterclaims proving that the reasons are not convincing.
scientists proof that
scientists prove that
by different artist which had different style than Rembrandt;
by different artist who had different styles than Rembrandt did;
the scientists proof that
the scientists prove that
the original wood of the painting are made from
the original wood of the painting is made from
Sentence: Second, the professor explains the error of the light shadow illumination by suggestion that that shadow had been added by different artist which had different style than Rembrandt;therefore, the shadow of light was not partial as the article states and the real beneath shado was realistic and belongs to the famous Dutch painter.
Error: shado Suggestion: shadow
Sentence: Third,the lecture states that when the fur of the woman in the painting had been added ,those howm made it need to add extra woods above the real one.And after examination the scientists proof that the original wood of the painting are made from the same tree of other Rembrandts painting.Which completely refutes what the reading passage suggested.
Error: howm Suggestion: how
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Always put a space after punctuation marks. Essay e-rater is sensitive.
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 4 12
No. of Words: 230 250
No. of Characters: 1134 1200
No. of Different Words: 125 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.894 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.398 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 57.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.159 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.589 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.17 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4