The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The more industrialized a society, the more waste is emitted from each household. This is partly because industrialization encourage households to consume goods and also due to absence of proper waste management system. If there exists adequate infrastructure that provides optimal allocation of household waste quota, the dire outcome such as global warming derived from overflow of household waste would alleviate. However, imposing strict limits on the acceptable trash from households is not achievable because of some constraints that policy makers face. Moreover, there is superior alternative to trash quota which is constructing household trash emission market.
In reality, every household generates different amount of trash depending on household size, income, and propensity to consumption. Therefore, government should first observe household properties that decide amount of waste a household make, and then decide the distribution of quota. However, policy maker cannot properly decide an optimal amount of allowed trash from each household because there are household properties that are impossible to accurately measure and households always have an incentive to falsely report their traits. Propensity to consumption, for instance, would be often overstated by households in order for them to take larger waste quota from government. Therefore, it is extremely challenging for policy makers to properly set trash emission limit for each household.
Additionally, even if policy maker can figure out the ideal trash quota for each household, strict limit would not be achieved without cost. For high-income households, they would sway government officials to have more favorable quota for them taking advantage of their influential position in society. On the other hand, low-income households that cannot meet the trash limitation would be willing to take illegal measure to get rid of their trash because they cannot handle the penalty from not abiding by the quota. Therefore, strict limits may not bring the desired policy result because of its rigidity.
Alternatively, building a market for household trash emission market would be free from above listed difficulties because it utilizes market mechanism. Construction of an emission market that allow households to freely trade garbage emission allowance would result in maximization of consumer utility and would enable the government to control the total trash generated from households. Adam Smith claimed a market is ran by "invisible hands" which means no government official is needed when the market is properly functioning. With its price mechanism, household trash emission market would maximize social surplus which was impossible with strict quota.
As consumption is a gist of capitalism, household generated trash would constantly increase in amount without appropriate policy. If the government fail to monitor and control the household trash amount, various environmental disasters would eventually harm the humanity. However, strict quota is a policy too difficult to implement and not effective enough to protect our civilization.
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 73
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 40
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 80
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 60
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
The more industrialized a society, the more waste is emitted
Description: 'the more...the more' is not used properly
because industrialization encourage households
because industrialization encourages households
Construction of an emission market that allow households
Construction of an emission market that allows households
Sentence: Therefore, government should first observe household properties that decide amount of waste a household make, and then decide the distribution of quota.
Description: The fragment household make , is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace make with verb, past tense
Sentence: If the government fail to monitor and control the household trash amount, various environmental disasters would eventually harm the humanity.
Description: The fragment government fail to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace fail with verb, past participle
-------------
arguments: OK
-------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 462 350
No. of Characters: 2610 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.636 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.649 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.854 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 216 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 159 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 118 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 92 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.64 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.132 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5