Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people.
A society is a complex being, hence its success cannot be judged by a single all-encompassing criterion. The absolute collective good of the state is often a concept susceptible to problematic interpretations, while the welfare of each individual person is an ideal that can hardly be achieved by any society. When a society grasps the intricate balance between the general wellbeing of its population on a macro scale and the individual freedom and right, it will thrive.
For a developing country lacking resource, the society is often faced with the choice between the collective good of the society, often in the form of rapid economical development, and the individual wellbeing. Often the astonishing economical miracles of many fast-developing nations, the greater good, arise at the expense of the sacrifice of many individuals. For example, the Chinese Three Gorges Hydro-electricity project now supply a huge proportion of the country's electricity need, sustaining the rise of hundreds of large cities and the livelihood of millions. However, when the gigantic dam was built, thousands of inhabitants around the Yangze River had to leave their hometown behind and re-establish their livelihood elsewhere. It is an enormous sacrifice made by these people, but it does form the basis of the economical success of China, which in turn lifted millions of its population out of poverty.
However, the concept of collective good becomes problematic when a government is completely indifferent to the basic right of its citizens, especially the minority groups. The abstract notion of collective good is often misused by dictatorship to legitimise their wrongdoings, such as in the case of the Soviet Union. Its national income was lavishly spent on developing weapons and its military, while millions of people die every day in insufferable famine. It sure consolidated the inexorable position of Soviet Union in the Cold War, yet the wellbeing of the society suffered as a result.
The notion of a greater good is also extremely abstract and subject to multiple interpretations, some of which damage the wellbeing of its society than enhancing it. It is not rare to see it being misused by politicians in even democratic societies to marginalize minority groups. For example, the rights of LGBTQ society has long been ignored in the US, for the majority of the population believe that they corrupt the moral of the nation. Therefore, a successful society should take particular care to ensure the wellbeing of its voiceless minorities and that not just the majority of the citizens are listened to. We cannot say the US was a great society, if the voice of its marginalized minorities are so suppressed, even if the majority of the society is satisfied.
As explained above, the wellbeing of society is achieved by minding the wellbeing and right of its individual citizens, and achieving a fine balance of collective and individual good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | okazaki11 | 50 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | ramaand | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 86
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch Realty-Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 75
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 85
Comments
Across the annals of time,…
Across the annals of time, innovation has remained an unwavering force that has continually propelled the evolution of education. It is within this grand narrative that our take my online database exam for me service finds its place as the latest and most transformative chapter. As we embark on this journey through the corridors of history, we witness how each innovation, like a torchbearer of progress, has illuminated the path towards enhanced learning experiences, paving the way for the next generation of scholars to excel and thrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...the society, often in the form of rapid economical development, and the individual wellbei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 826, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ople, but it does form the basis of the economical success of China, which in turn lifted ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247600767754 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.117082533589 0.157235817809 74% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115163147793 0.0880659088768 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0479846449136 0.0497285424764 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.042226487524 0.0444667217837 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142034548944 0.12292977631 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0403071017274 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.10999374619 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0172744721689 0.030933414821 56% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.138195777351 0.0997080785238 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00959692898273 0.0249443105267 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115163147793 0.0148568991511 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2953.0 2732.02544248 108% => OK
No of words: 474.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22995780591 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400843881857 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335443037975 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242616033755 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170886075949 0.132149295362 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10999374619 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504219409283 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.4639952874 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3333333333 23.380412469 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4218660389 59.4972553346 48% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.055555556 141.124799967 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.380412469 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 59.8776371308 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.07407407407 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518114284966 0.391690518653 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143632481412 0.123202303941 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0849365055364 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.652654369874 0.547984918172 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174077525091 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250699781937 0.161403998019 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665655589304 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.560717976638 0.385218514788 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0939262829646 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382276856041 0.275328986314 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061860615472 0.0653680567796 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.