Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.
Since the beginning of this century, in all distinctive civilized societies, it has been a controversial argument among individuals, through which numerous conflicts have been engendered. Some people are inclined toward the viewpoint that relatives were more important to people than they are today, while others consider this issue in a whole diverse perspective. Although an absolute conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all the opposite attitudes I fundamentally concur with the statement that the extended relatives became less important today. The outstanding reasons for my opinion would be explored as follows.
First and foremost, nowadays, people are busier than they were in the past; therefore, they will not be able to spend much time with their remote relatives. As a matter of fact, nowadays, people have to work harder because of the inflation and higher prices. being preoccupied with both work and close family issues, individuals are less enthusiastic about attending family events.
In addition to lacking time, individuals are tended to live separately. In fact, they prefer to spend their time with their friends rather than their family. Due to the fact, that most of the family members cannot get along, even siblings have such an issue, individuals do not enjoy accompanying their family members. Although, having fun with extended family would be a pleasure for people, it also, can cause much more difficulties for people. For the sake of clarity, I would like to provide an example of my brother who works two shifts at a restaurant. Although he did not have time for our cousin's birthday party, he attended with her wife and children. Since our cousin, called Sam, always hated my brother, Sam ruined the day for my brother with mocking him and making fun of him in front of people. Ever since that event, my brother dos not attend any of our family events.
Apart from the points made above there is also another reason that I would like to discuss about. Nowadays, because of the advancements in technology, there are lots of alternative options instead of meeting your extended family. Indeed, if you are bored you can watch TV, surf the net, or travel. Thanks to the progression in technology, everything is getting much easier than it was in the past. with this great spectrum of choices, this is predictable that people would rather other activities than spending time with their family, especially extended family.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments, which have been explored above I strongly agree with the statement that the significance of extended family has been opaque due to the fact that people would rather to spend their time in other ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | Lee Shyu | 70 | view |
| 2016-07-15 | Vida Pashaei | 73 | view |
- 4-day employees instead of five days. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for the students to learn concepts and ideas than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than traveling to foreign countries. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...use of the inflation and higher prices. being preoccupied with both work and close fa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ng much easier than it was in the past. with this great spectrum of choices, this is...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'apart from', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237623762376 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.160396039604 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0574257425743 0.0866891130778 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0613861386139 0.046263068375 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0673267326733 0.0685040099705 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150495049505 0.118717715034 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0574257425743 0.0351676179071 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62797582037 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0237623762376 0.0309702414327 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0772277227723 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0217821782178 0.0209618222197 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00792079207921 0.0139019557991 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2708.0 2387.08602151 113% => OK
No of words: 446.0 408.028673835 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07174887892 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367713004484 0.338922669872 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260089686099 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.179372197309 0.174417080927 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114349775785 0.112833075102 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62797582037 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540358744395 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 63.4603734578 59.2087087015 107% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2380952381 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5899758568 48.84282405 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.952380952 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2380952381 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.644075263715 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.247063848 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.54109589041 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349480168176 0.300154397459 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100444077497 0.103427244359 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0674809137454 0.0752933317313 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.468340380514 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153292274214 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122815459764 0.114077575197 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832865842763 0.0781384742642 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.327423872585 0.336927656856 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0487507470859 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240617735829 0.210909579961 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688740819805 0.0618886996521 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.