49) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
When it comes to the issue the ways of communication, some people prefer to use modern equipment for contact with each other instead of the face-to-face communication. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account the following reasons.
First and the most important reason is that the use modern way for connection makes life more comfortable. I think that a small example can give some light on this matter. Imagine you purchased a ware of store, while it has some problems. Hence, you decide to complain of the company, which has not any representative in your city. You can advocate much time to travel other cities and meet with manager of company, while he surly has not time to speak with you. However, you can sit on the sofa and turn on the lap top and send email for the company.
A further point we must consider is that we can save money and time with modern ways of communication. I think that there is not a better example than a person who studies in abroad. Because of financial problems, he cannot travel to his country to meet his family and friends, when he feels low. Nevertheless, he can meet their needs with the use of a smartphone, which allows him to have variety of connection such as video call, massage, and emails. These facilities do not impose any costs to him, because all of them free and he can use them every time.
Apart from points I made above, social applications provide many facilities that you cannot have access them in personal communication. For instance, Face book, which is a great social networks webs, introduce new facility that it assists users to find their old classmates or old neighbors. In addition, this web allows us to contact with many people in any corner of the world, which is approximately impossible by face-to-face communication.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that we are living in the modern age and need to use new ways to communicate, which are affordable, make life comfortable, and put many facilities at our disposal. Admittedly, as an English proverb goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that new communicate approaches do not allow us to transmit all of our emotional. Nonetheless, I think that its profits outweigh dangerous. Last but not least, I hope that people gain the deeper understanding that sometimes we need to have face to face communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-08 | ZhicongLiang | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc 50
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 86
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 58
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222448979592 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.140816326531 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0959183673469 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0469387755102 0.046263068375 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0816326530612 0.0685040099705 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114285714286 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.00204081632653 0.0351676179071 6% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.82802360266 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0326530612245 0.0309702414327 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0877551020408 0.0887237588012 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0183673469388 0.0209618222197 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0183673469388 0.0139019557991 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2516.0 2387.08602151 105% => OK
No of words: 431.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83758700696 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.303944315545 0.338922669872 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.220417633411 0.251872472559 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162412993039 0.174417080927 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113689095128 0.112833075102 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82802360266 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54060324826 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 62.8110723279 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5909090909 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5716859671 48.84282405 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 120.699889404 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5909090909 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.681818181818 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 41.632672432 45.7405998639 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.25757575758 1.45489161554 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360180675847 0.300154397459 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0965739554323 0.103427244359 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0649872775342 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.473319104846 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132827601416 0.151897553556 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109619714467 0.114077575197 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739848627184 0.0781384742642 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.27660572335 0.336927656856 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0528481351427 0.067059652881 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223715259714 0.210909579961 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447277003971 0.0618886996521 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.