In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
In any field for an individual to progress seeking the positive opinion of the field and contrasting opinions are necessary. Progress requires majorly the harmonious views rather than contrasting views. For instance, many personalities have become eminent and made progress because of the harmonious views. A group task can be completed only by the encouragement and support of all the people in it and head in the same direction. Similarly, the progress can be done with the positive views of the people compared to the contrasting views of the people.
Firstly, habituating in the same decorum of harmonious situations leads us to the more comprehensive study of the field. The contrasting points impede the progress making us disparaged. The discussions regarding a field of study are fruitful if the positive points are acquired and the progress can be made based on the valid points. This is possible only when the positive views are obtained. For instance, in solving a problem knowing the background of the subject and proceeding would solve the problem. The contrasting view of “problem cannot be solved” would belittle us making no further progress in the problem.
Secondly, the positive and contrast views have a major impact on the mind thought process. Psychological effects can also be treated with the harmonious views. The persons with disabilities have major positive views by which they are successful in various fields. The person with amputated leg, may not run in his life time. But with artificial ones he can make it. This thought comes through the positive opinions from the peers rather than coercing them with the contrasting view of “cannot run”. We can find many of these people running in marathons. So, irrespective of the field positive attitude favors.
Conclusively, based on above premises contrasting views majorly hinder the person’s overall development. The person should be filled with vehement enthusiasm and positive views to accomplish his goal and make progress in the desired field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Seonghun | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | melavdev | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | jdpatel1107 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lve the problem. The contrasting view of apos;problem cannot be solved apos; woul...
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... with amputated leg, may not run in his life time. But with artificial ones he can make i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ercing them with the contrasting view of apos;cannot run apos;. We can find many ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231607629428 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.160762942779 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100817438692 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0463215258856 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299727520436 0.0444667217837 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122615803815 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0762942779292 0.0406280797675 188% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.85602231681 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0108991825613 0.030933414821 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.133514986376 0.0997080785238 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0326975476839 0.0249443105267 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00544959128065 0.0148568991511 37% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2063.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 328.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28963414634 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399390243902 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317073170732 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234756097561 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131097560976 0.132149295362 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85602231681 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496951219512 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 50.8334428697 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.619047619 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1844880314 59.4972553346 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2380952381 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.619047619 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.674092028746 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 47.3263646922 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.81609195402 1.64882698954 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174905049355 0.391690518653 45% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120323240921 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0975922929573 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.544665486781 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149130647577 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807177664425 0.161403998019 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050912502537 0.0892212321368 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.514741083851 0.385218514788 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111800107872 0.0692045440612 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127541310683 0.275328986314 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492967992796 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.