Has the ease of the cooking improved life?
Throughout the history food has been being one the most primary necessities for the human, subsequently people are always seeking to find food. On the other hand, a large crowd has suffered from diverse disease due to the shortage of food, and sometimes this lack may ends up with death. Nowadays, we live in an era of time that the topic of food has been solved in many countries so that a plethora of people are in the conviction that life gets improved due to readily available to food storage. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that this issue is still a matter of concern in some regions. I am of the opinion that each point of view has their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, undoubtedly food issues are continuously developed along with progress in other fields, and advanced technology has a crucial role in this regard. Thanks to the modern cooking methods, people can grow the fresh and nutrition ingredients. This element not only makes the process of preparing the food much easier but also helps the people to be far healthier. In addition, there are different devices and methods in order to preserve the food in the best possible quality that is an absolute relief for many people. Furthermore, cooking is kind of entertainment for many people. They have mixed different ingredient and make delicious food. In fact, the cooking becomes a popular industry that lots of people have been drawn to it hoping to experience the better life.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that rapid changes and complexity of today's world present new challenges and put new demands on different societies. Poverty may still one of the critical obstacles in some undeveloped countries. In Africa, numerous kids have being dying as food is unreachable for them. In many South America countries, people commit various crimes because they are dying owing to starve. Furthermore, drastic statistics are shown that these poor countries have mostly possessed rich resources of oil and gas, and this adversity has been imposed due to excessive greed of others developed countries to reach their lucrativeا resources.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, I am convinced that food is a controversial debate that has two distinct impacts on people's life. For some of them becomes the tool of enjoying more from their life, and for the rest is the main driver for dealing with endless miseries. Therefore, each individual, as a human, should not overlook this inequity in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2022-06-16 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 76
- Essay topics: A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill 80
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242171189979 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.15866388309 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114822546973 0.0866891130778 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459290187891 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229645093946 0.0685040099705 34% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133611691023 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0563674321503 0.0351676179071 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6511332553 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027139874739 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00208768267223 0.00188951952338 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.104384133612 0.0887237588012 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125260960334 0.0209618222197 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00835073068894 0.0139019557991 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2623.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 438.0 408.028673835 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98858447489 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344748858447 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27397260274 0.251872472559 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175799086758 0.174417080927 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130136986301 0.112833075102 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6511332553 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563926940639 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 67.5754755621 59.2087087015 114% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3221671101 48.84282405 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.15 120.699889404 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 49.297260274 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.89908256881 1.45489161554 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392943473038 0.300154397459 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0878302085744 0.103427244359 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0474051837448 0.0752933317313 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.481442224787 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139094176245 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154189682328 0.114077575197 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110889505422 0.0781384742642 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388389788074 0.336927656856 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.130806281399 0.067059652881 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294762216473 0.210909579961 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112389080835 0.0618886996521 182% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.