To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption?
NASA an ESA (European Space Agency) announced that 2016 and 2017 are going to be the warmest years in mankind history due to increased amount of emission into the atmosphere which, in turn has triggered many environmental and social issues worldwide. The latter has suggested increasing the price of fuel in order to reduce the number of vehicles in streets. Though it would be much better if the manufacturers involved such advanced technologies as electric motors and alternative sources of energy.
Rising the fuel price can dissuade people to drive as it would not be affordable to have vehicles, which is likely to diminish the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. The solution, nevertheless, might stagnate other industries which rely on fuel, which in turn prompts economic problems on top of environmental ones. Tourism, for instance, is a niche of many countries. In order to supply incessantly the countries with tourists, air companies have to have an affordable source of fuel. Thus, a high price for fuel could be a solution for environmental hazards; however, it also can be a cause of an economic disaster for many countries.
Future lies on new technologies. As increased number of vehicles are the main contaminants of the atmosphere due to the fact that they emit carbon dioxide to the air. Combustion engines can be substituted with electric ones, which are significantly more environment-friendly than the conventional ones. Moreover, if car manufacturers find electric-motor cars very expensive to produce massively, alternative sources of fuel might be a solution since combustion engines can be run by biofuel, one of the alternative sources of energy.
It is empirical that increased environmental hazards are solved by all means. As a result it has been suggested increasing the price of fuel; nevertheless, this solution seems to cause the other issues besides environmental ones. Thus, the other possible solutions should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-13 | Baldev singh sandhu | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Akilan | 73 | view |
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 61
- “Prevention is better that curve.” Out of a country’s budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 67
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 61
- The first chart shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s. Future lies on new technologies. As increased number of vehicles are the ma...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259365994236 0.247107183377 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.146974063401 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118155619597 0.0946595960268 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432276657061 0.0501214627716 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0172910662824 0.0437548338989 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135446685879 0.122226691241 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0345821325648 0.0403226058552 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.17989603807 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345821325648 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0893371757925 0.0861772015684 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.028818443804 0.021408717616 135% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014409221902 0.011925033212 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1970.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27388535032 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375796178344 0.374742101984 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292993630573 0.28420135186 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242038216561 0.203846283523 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165605095541 0.137316102897 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17989603807 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.1963985413 60.7387585426 89% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9333333333 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4233591031 49.517814964 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 127.492653851 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 50.2326963907 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.06944444444 1.69124875643 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463278749558 0.332605444948 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0869933941027 0.102741220458 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0594726840159 0.0668466124924 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.516489406787 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158766656835 0.148594505496 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19218837795 0.134430193775 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126304462139 0.0742795772207 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350443030605 0.324371583561 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.054319247382 0.0638462369009 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341308239427 0.228012699653 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010789835492 0.058150111329 19% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.4468937876 77% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.