Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world's forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
From the start of human civilization, the world population is raising tremendously while the size of the forest is dropping to a great extend. Someone believes that it is the biggest stride on earth as well as human prosperity. However, I would contend that it also evidences that we are the main culprits to the death of the world.
To begin with the supportive argument, the space freed from deforestation is the essential land resource provider for us to continue develop our city, making the world more suitable to human beings. Indeed, our human civilization starting from living inside the cave to living in the house or the high rise building is heavily dependent on the land. Without removal of forest, the space is insufficient to us to build the metropolises currently we have now. In this sense, deforestation actually gains us momentum on making the prosperity of the world.
Conversely making the world stride, the deforestation will eventually result to the world no longer inhabitable for human brings as long as all living things. The problem behind the removal of tree is that it will aggravate the problem of global warming. Scientifically, one of the well-known reasons of global warning is the release of carbon dioxide from different factories. Trees indeed alleviate this situation by transforming the carbon dioxide into oxygen so that our temperature will not raise exponentially. However, if we keep destroying the forest, it is believable that our temperature will rise to such a level that not only all humans can find nowhere to live, but also no animals can find a place to inhabit. There is indisputable evidence that the temperature of the earth is increasing year by year since the start of human civilization. Thus, the reason of deforestation making the world prosperity is unpersuasive.
All in all, the deforestation, instead of making stride on earth, is actually destroying the earth. I would urge all the governments and all the enterprises to stop killing the tree and take all necessary measures to protect the world's forests.
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 75
- The number of old people around the world is increasing dramatically Could this have more positive or negative effects on society or Do the advantages of the trend outweigh the disadvantages or Is this a positive development 71
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans,(opposing opinion) while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for foo 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... making the prosperity of the world. Conversely making the world stride, the deforestat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'conversely', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as well as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.247107183377 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.136363636364 0.155533422707 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748663101604 0.0946595960268 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0775401069519 0.0501214627716 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0427807486631 0.0437548338989 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125668449198 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0374331550802 0.0403226058552 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97381646218 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0374331550802 0.0326793684256 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136363636364 0.0861772015684 158% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0213903743316 0.021408717616 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00267379679144 0.011925033212 22% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2073.0 1933.35771543 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 316.048096192 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06140350877 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356725146199 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269005847953 0.28420135186 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187134502924 0.203846283523 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131578947368 0.137316102897 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97381646218 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.56093040696 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.5536320323 60.7387585426 90% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.375 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6562899616 49.517814964 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5625 127.492653851 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.814263465372 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 48.2755847953 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.55208333333 1.69124875643 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53876876223 0.332605444948 162% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149704739468 0.102741220458 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0517115174682 0.0668466124924 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.627743093794 0.534860350844 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120527901994 0.148594505496 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.270207540711 0.134430193775 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955249099628 0.0742795772207 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.51910371666 0.324371583561 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0441968314043 0.0638462369009 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.414746217003 0.228012699653 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442830902422 0.058150111329 76% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.