TPO 42-integrated
In the reading, the author provides three solutions for preventing birds to get injured when they try to fly through regular windows. On the other hand, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer casts doubt on each of the author's solutions and presents some evidence to the contrary.
First, the reading passage argues that utilizing one-way glass window instead of regular windows is more effective because birds will see the window as a barrier. Conversely, the lecturer asserts that the birds would find reflecting window like a mirror. They don't know mirror. In addition, it is likely that the picture of sky or trees is reflected on the one-way window. It causes to motivate birds to fly through that. It follows that using this kind of window would not work properly.
Furthermore, another solution that is made by the author is that by painting distinctive pattern colorful lines on the regular window, the birds will see the stripes and avoid to fly toward the windows. However, the lecturer refutes this point by explaining that the birds interpret unpainted areas as open holes. Therefore, they would fly in the direction of the window. In order to work this solution well, the stripes should be very small, but in this way, the inside of the building might be too dark.
Finally, the passage posits that people can make benefits from the natural ability of birds for navigating their path by using magnetic fields. Hence, if they establish an instrument like a magnetic compass on the regular window, the birds will change their direction from the window appropriately. On the contrary, the speaker disagrees with this idea. According to him, the birds use their magnetic senses for migration in long distances. They cannot use this capability when they travel short distances like flying from one city to another. For their short trips, their eyes help them to detect the sunlight direction order to finding the best way for their journey.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-03 | saeid.rashidi66 | 75 | view |
2016-09-17 | MANDANAR | 86 | view |
- TPO 17-integerated 73
- Integrated 48 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Integreted TPO 21 86
- Integrated 48 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d reflecting window like a mirror. They dont know mirror. In addition, it is likely ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'motivating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: motivating
...lected on the one-way window. It causes to motivate birds to fly through that. It follows t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid flying'.
Suggestion: avoid flying
...dow, the birds will see the stripes and avoid to fly toward the windows. However, the lectur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237057220708 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.147138964578 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0762942779292 0.0723426182421 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0354223433243 0.0435111971325 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0463215258856 0.0277247811725 167% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133514986376 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0408719346049 0.0370669169778 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45938920553 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299727520436 0.0208969081088 143% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136239782016 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0272479564033 0.0158828679856 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00817438692098 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1989.0 1645.83664459 121% => OK
No of words: 329.0 271.125827815 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04559270517 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367781155015 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288753799392 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176291793313 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100303951368 0.113142543107 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45938920553 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537993920973 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.0413296825 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2777777778 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.208527426 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 47.153157717 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.79761904762 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.649774094694 0.549887131256 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114046265939 0.142949733639 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0548368386898 0.0787303798458 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.54640130914 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166108115776 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258398319367 0.266732575781 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974663036166 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.428903004062 0.414875509568 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0833901353911 0.0530846634433 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.462134663443 0.40443939384 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428417138702 0.0528353158467 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.