The table shows the sales figures of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five countries,namely,U.K,Switzerland,Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004.
IELTS Sample Answer 2
The table shows the sales figures of Fairtrade-labelled goods in five European countries in millions of euros in 1999 and 2004. The figures are for coffee and bananas.
First of all, although coffee sales increased over the period in all five countries, there was a large difference in how they increased. In Switzerland and in Belgium, fairtrade coffee sales more or less doubled to 6 and 1.7 million respectively, while in Denmark and Sweden sales increased very little, rising only 0.2 million in both countries. In contrast, Britain’s consumption of coffee rocketed from 1.5 to 20 million, which catapulted it from the third largest consumer in 1999, to first five years later.
It was a slightly different story with Bananas. The first key difference is that generally fairtrade Banana sales increased dramatically. For example, in the UK they tripled to over 45 million (from 15), in Switzerland they rose by over 500% to 5.5, and in Denmark they rose even faster, growing from 0.6 to 4 million, which was an increase of more than 600%. While these countries experienced dramatic growth, in Belgium and Sweden, sales actually halved to 1 and 0.9 million respectively. As a result, these countries fell to fourth and fifth.
In conclusion, coffee sales increased in more countries than banana sales. It also shows that the sales of both rose much faster in the UK than any other countries, though Switzerland also did well.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in the UK and the proportion of men and women who held them in 2008 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- United intergovernmental panel on climate change report that climactic changes in northern hemisphere will cause drastick change in sea current and will raise the sea level. 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'more or less']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223021582734 0.268076937826 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.0935251798561 0.116061578633 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0647482014388 0.0759168565197 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0719424460432 0.0366838410393 196% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0251798561151 0.0131127313244 192% => OK
Prepositions: 0.161870503597 0.155750635184 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0143884892086 0.0379272487307 38% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.84226939634 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287769784173 0.0210936926555 136% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.068345323741 0.0948980150116 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0107913669065 0.00967000014798 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1460.0 1161.00487805 126% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.9 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03305785124 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73763899035 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342975206612 0.337110787985 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264462809917 0.247514529752 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190082644628 0.171178102325 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128099173554 0.112407865282 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84226939634 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.546246751206 101% => OK
Word variations: 53.6679927426 49.3433353143 109% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 23.0094962315 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.316664285 42.9750493124 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 135.714022679 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.0094962315 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.689975730869 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 46.6129476584 47.7609492067 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.09433962264 2.94281807926 71% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592828040699 0.418131533498 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116765888234 0.181151798455 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0772548862023 0.0850326197045 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.600927427413 0.706616315825 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.233228644304 0.157042692854 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248456683545 0.228904883108 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1427446631 0.108899403657 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.304729033729 0.367819155151 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.193976966437 0.0812612215331 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356852916184 0.316326947829 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.223476729653 0.0921553760075 242% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 7.1512195122 168% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.