In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is easy to see some people get excessive high salaries. While some people think that this is good for their country, others do not; they think government should allow experts to get the salaries at a certain level. I personally am in favor of limiting the salaries of experts (latter point of view).
In the integration period, the government needs talented people to server their countries, and to attract talents they give great accommodation and competitive salaries. Moreover, in some of industrial fields such as genetic engineering or artificial intelligent the government does not have any experts. Hence, they attract offshore experts by offering extremely high salaries; this enables the country to strengthen its industrial and economic growth. In addition, the most important things in some projects are quality and schedule. This leads to the demand of the right people for the right positions, and the result is that they will accept to pay more for these positions.
However, the extremely high salaries that create a burden on the wage policy of government also cause confusion for citizens. The money, which the government pays to experts, comes from the tax of the citizens; therefore, they have the right to ask the government to use their tax effectively. In my point of view, this is right. In short term, a government could pay an extra salary to experts, but they also have to train their local people to improve knowledge and skill. Gradually, local people will be able to replace experts in all fields, and the government may not need to recruit offshore experts. Finally, people will feel satisfied while the government will use money effectively.
In conclusion, while we are arguing why government should pay extra money for their experts, we also think how to replace them in future. And the certain thing government should do is prepare a law which allow people get money at the right level.
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 81
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- The overuse of natural resources causes an ultimate exhaust of them People have been using them to be in the swim of new styles such as making new furniture of recent design This causes a huge harm to the environment Therefore the government should discou 93
- Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your reasons and relevant examples. 67
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...erts, we also think how to replace them in future. And the certain thing government shoul...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in short', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237430167598 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.150837988827 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0865921787709 0.0946595960268 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0530726256983 0.0501214627716 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0502793296089 0.0437548338989 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0949720670391 0.122226691241 78% => OK
Participles: 0.00837988826816 0.0403226058552 21% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.64633996954 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0446927374302 0.0326793684256 137% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108938547486 0.0861772015684 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251396648045 0.021408717616 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0139664804469 0.011925033212 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1921.0 1933.35771543 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 316.048096192 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.003125 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35625 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265625 0.28420135186 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19375 0.203846283523 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1375 0.137316102897 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64633996954 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.037074148 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50625 0.56093040696 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.7101174012 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.7743622355 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7176780522 49.517814964 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0625 127.492653851 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7743622355 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 46.5625 49.1944974215 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.34065934066 1.69124875643 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332466005717 0.332605444948 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112468081959 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0674167618348 0.0668466124924 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528685260958 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140627644221 0.148594505496 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149086835452 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847972819341 0.0742795772207 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449885075572 0.324371583561 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0996548467985 0.0638462369009 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264529288886 0.228012699653 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990264093757 0.058150111329 170% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.