Getting the advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers.
Most of the people opt to make decisions after getting advice from others since it allows them to get aware from diverse aspects of the situation. A plethora of people is in the conviction that suggestions which have received from elder friends is more valuable as they have more experiences. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that the peers usually offer practical advice. I am of the opinion that, both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, undoubtedly, one of the primary purposes of taking others’ suggestions is get acquainted with plausible consequences, either (whether) positive or negative. Therefore, the age of the people is accounted as the main driver of having the more experiences in this regard. Work experience is a good example that people often ask their older friends to share their experience with them. Furthermore, older friends may have objective view points, and it is precious thing because it assist them to see other facets of the decision that seem unimportant or even invisible to ordinary out-sight. For instance, in the work experience example they can talk about the work atmosphere, future job opportunities in that particular field or the possible obstacles to get promotions, and also how people can distinguish themselves in that job. Admittedly, these are incredible issues that people can hear from their older friends.
Another crucial fact that should be taken into consideration is the friends who belong to the comparatively same age category has the same goal and attitude toward different topics. There are more familiar with current situation; consequently, they may have more update information. This similar situation is of the utmost factor for getting fabulous advice which is so useful. Besides, as the peers have better understanding from each other, they are more intimate with each other that are extremely vital element. As a result, they can consult when they just need to be calm, without getting any rational advice. They can sit beside each other with a cup of coffee, and have pleasurable conversation regarding the problem, and getting the good decision without any mistake is not the matter of concern for them.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that people can use suggestion from different friend according to the situation. In some cases they need to make accurate decision so they have to get precisely suggestion and further experience will be very helpful. But sometimes just some affection talking is enough; however, fashionable knowledge of peers should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-30 | yoonjung1917@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | precious oseghale | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | Mehrdad.imn | 37 | view |
| 2018-02-17 | hd1366 | 86 | view |
| 2016-10-15 | Delara | 83 | view |
- dinosaurs were endotherm 80
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 70
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment?1. Fund research to develop environmentally friend 86
- Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building? 76
- TPO 32 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 501, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...ts, and it is precious thing because it assist them to see other facets of the decisio...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'as a result', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204968944099 0.229887763892 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.146997929607 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.130434782609 0.0866891130778 150% => OK
Adverbs: 0.055900621118 0.046263068375 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0685040099705 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120082815735 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0351966873706 0.0351676179071 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82231657253 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248447204969 0.0309702414327 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0993788819876 0.0887237588012 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0248447204969 0.0209618222197 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186335403727 0.0139019557991 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2727.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 437.0 408.028673835 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24027459954 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382151029748 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304347826087 0.251872472559 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212814645309 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155606407323 0.112833075102 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82231657253 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535469107551 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 62.1720997801 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8390929071 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.526315789 120.699889404 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.842105263158 0.644075263715 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 53.4347826087 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.43801652893 1.45489161554 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296699962127 0.300154397459 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0827115121621 0.103427244359 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0462217059763 0.0752933317313 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475010560626 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0983823377528 0.151897553556 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118013517237 0.114077575197 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609214481149 0.0781384742642 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403632977723 0.336927656856 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0696538793064 0.067059652881 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213340206928 0.210909579961 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774918981655 0.0618886996521 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.