Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or

Essay topics:

Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reasons on which that claim is based.

In general, it is true that world today is more complex than it was in past. But this does not justify the claim made in the prompt. It is often the events of the past and its learnings that make way to decide and come up with new plausible solution. Everywhere people look for precedents to decide on taking big decision. Experience in general helps people to make prudent decision on big problems. In any case, political, social, or scientific; past experience have huge impact on discerning judgments in any predicament.

In the aftermath of world's most harrowing industrial disaster, Bhopal Gas Tragedy in 1984, industrial stalwarts came together to introspect and learn from the findings to make stern safety rules so that such incident does not happen again in future. This led to formation of Process Safety Management, which serves as guidebook in making processes safer for people as well as environment. Often in the times of political imbroglio, leader looks in to ancient philosophies to seek truth and wisdom. Past experiences of previous Presidents help in construing foreign policies of a nation. People try not to follow the same path which in past have backfired on them.

In scientific world past experiences have always served a basis of future experiments, leading to discoveries. For example, the structure of an atom was studied by several scientists, and each new discovery was based on the past experiences and their failures to scientifically justify every aspect. Each flaw was religiously studied, and in the whole process the basic structure was proposed and accepted globally. Similarly, in the field of medical sciences, past experiences of patients serve an important criterion in decision of type of medications to be provided. Several people are allergic to sporadic things; their previous experiences help them in avoiding further complications.

However, these precedents should be considered only when there is relevance in other aspects of life. Past experiences should be collaborated in cognizant of the fact that world has changed in every sense i.e. economic, political, and the countries are now more independent on other. These factors should not be neglected in making important decisions. Things which were quite popular and collectively believed to be true do not hold the same sacrosanct status in current world.

Conclusively, it is always the past experiences which make people more prudent and discerning in their day-today decision making. But often things in the past do not carry the same relevancy in contemporary world, and decisions should be based on a balance between these two.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-23 Raian Islam 66 view
2019-08-04 rushabh71 58 view
2019-06-25 Lucybrian 83 view
2019-02-27 monil 58 view
2019-02-10 Gh.Ne 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user nav3057 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...world today is more complex than it was in past. But this does not justify the claim ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...case, political, social, or scientific; past experience have huge impact on discerning judgment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hat such incident does not happen again in future. This led to formation of Process Safet...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: Experiences
... philosophies to seek truth and wisdom. Past experiences of previous Presidents help in construi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ckfired on them. In scientific world past experiences have always served a basis of future ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...and each new discovery was based on the past experiences and their failures to scientifically ju...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...arly, in the field of medical sciences, past experiences of patients serve an important criterio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: Experiences
... is relevance in other aspects of life. Past experiences should be collaborated in cognizant of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...orld. Conclusively, it is always the past experiences which make people more prudent and disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in general', 'as well as', 'in any case', 'it is true']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235042735043 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.162393162393 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.126068376068 0.0880659088768 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0641025641026 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0213675213675 0.0444667217837 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132478632479 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0491452991453 0.0406280797675 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90588147744 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299145299145 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00213675213675 0.0016655270985 128% => OK
Determiners: 0.0747863247863 0.0997080785238 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00854700854701 0.0249443105267 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106837606838 0.0148568991511 72% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2647.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 424.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2429245283 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38679245283 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304245283019 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228773584906 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179245283019 0.132149295362 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90588147744 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 219.290929204 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544811320755 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 63.24064465 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.4347826087 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6051906278 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.086956522 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 48.8593109106 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.68103448276 1.64882698954 102% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438166362378 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.091038806873 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0887244769725 0.077325440228 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496481173683 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115539760123 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164667141824 0.161403998019 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748299484008 0.0892212321368 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403237827863 0.385218514788 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0461740820484 0.0692045440612 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308920837865 0.275328986314 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552611805648 0.0653680567796 85% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.