young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities
Although some people think that the young people do not pay attention to their society in comparison to the past one, In my opinion, this comparison is really unfair because of some reasons that I will mention.
Firstly, nowadays young generation are busy, and they do not have extra time to spend half of it for helping. In these days, the young people in conjunction with the study have to work, because they need to gather money to make their future lives. In fact, the young people's expectations of life increase and encourage them to work and study hard instead of spending their time for pleasure time. So, the majority of them do not have any amusement in their life. However, in the past, the young people did either studying or working, not both of them in same time since this situation let them help to their society. Hence, the situation of the nowadays young people is incomparable with that past one.
In addition, the expectations of the people from young people increase that originate from the gap generation. In the past, people used to commute with their neighborhood family since they had this chance to became aware of their problems and helped them to resolve them. Nevertheless, now young people do not have this time and eager to go to the family or neighborhood assist them. Actually, now they do not enjoy these activities because they think they can spend their time for the more important issue. And as I said before, this difference arises from the changing of the people's view about the life. As a result, the second reason that causes people think hat nowadays young people's do not spend enough time for helping to their communities is the diversity of the new generation with the past.
Finally, the ways of the young people aid to their communities completely change.As I said before, today they do not have this time and eager to go to their family home and notice from their problem. In fact, instead of that activity, they prefer by utilizing of the technology call them or if they need money send it by the internet. Obviously, the ways of helping are totally unlike with the past. Accordingly, the dissimilar method of helping create this conception that the young people do not consider adequate time for aiding to their communities.
In conclusion, the difficulties of these days lives that makes the young people an engaged generation, the unlike ways of helping, and by increasing the people's expectation from them develop this idea that they do help to their communities as the past one did.
- People learn easily from the friends beside them. 60
- tpo 40 71
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 81
- tpo 22 73
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize . 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
... to their communities completely change.As I said before, today they do not have t...
^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...viously, the ways of helping are totally unlike with the past. Accordingly, the d...
^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past. Accordingly, the dissimilar method of helping create this conception that t...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... ways of helping, and by increasing the peoples expectation from them develop this idea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78815489749 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49593460476 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423690205011 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3320149447 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474830993234 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184305627365 0.076458572812 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109114184346 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305461178374 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844951883619 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.