The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph shows US. Energy utilization and sources in 6 major categories from 1980 to 2030. The units are given in quadrillion units (qu.). Overall, fossil Fuels dominate and surpass other sources, and have an increasing trend as a projection.
At first glance it can be seen that, Petrol and oil were main energy source throughout the timescale. It started from 35 qu. which is almost the sum of all other sources in year 1980, had a fluctuating trend for 20 years, but increased steadily after year 2000 until 2030 and ended up with 50 qu. Similarly Coal and Natural Gas had also increasing trend although, coal keeps its trend upward and reaches 32 qu. in 2030, projection shows that natural gas reaches its plateau in year 2015 with 25 qu. and keeps at this level for the next 15 years.
On the contrary, nuclear energy and alternative clean sources, like solar/wind and hydro-power are not used commonly, all started from 3 qu. in 1980, and their use fluctuated in a band between 4-9 qu. throughout the timescale. Unfortunately, projections shows that use of green energy will not increase in future noticeably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Rashila | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 62
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... units are given in quadrillion units qu.. Overall, fossil Fuels dominate and surp...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...000 until 2030 and ended up with 50 qu. Similarly Coal and Natural Gas had also increasin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, similarly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83419689119 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63663886029 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647668393782 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 43.6607982763 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.6428571429 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7857142857 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158604200087 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564998749341 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581934312773 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111203492669 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00998149841737 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.