Are we always supposed to tell the truth in our relationships?
To tell the truth, one expression we may use many time every day. A majority of people believe that honesty is one of most important characteristic one can find in their friend. Generally speaking, I would agree with this opinion that any relationship is formed based on a sense of reliability and more important, will progress as long as this feeling keeps going. I would suggest three reasons based on my general facts in addition to my personal expriences to support the argument.
First, It is worthwhile consider the importance of telling the truth for close friendships or marriage. In fact, the reliability is the most important characteristic; anyone can find in his/her friendship. Although, it is clear that anyone is a combination of good and bad attributes, if any of your close friends lie to you, it would definitely has a remarkable negative impact on your future relationship. Friends rely on themselves, without for fear, based on they believe they do not lie to each other. The same sense cause that many cautions one consider in ordinary relationship, neglected in closed relationships. Without reliability, the closed friendships will destroy entirely because there is no reason for close friends to tell the most secrets to each other. This sense can be remarkably seen in the famous tv series "Friends", six guys live together in an apartment and have closed friendships;
Additionally, it is prevalent that some people conceal the truth in work relationship or even change the truth to gain more personal benefits. It is, however, a short period strategy to get more money, it would lead to other colleages, for example, avoid you because they understand that you lie even though it hurts them. One of my personal experience proves me that one who lies confidently, without regret, does not at all a reliable person to make relationship even for short time.
To sum it up, I am of the opinion that although not telling the truth sometimes can benefit us in short period, it lead to our face be a dishonest person in public eyes in the long period ; therefore it is not recommended at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-04 | milad_pasand | 76 | view |
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 80
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...ll the truth, one expression we may use many time every day. A majority of people believe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...friends lie to you, it would definitely has a remarkable negative impact on your fu...
^^^
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n apartment and have closed friendships; Additionally, it is prevalent that some ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...imes can benefit us in short period, it lead to our face be a dishonest person in pu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in fact, in short, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95530726257 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00676477026 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550279329609 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7729120958 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158627350495 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568710097313 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617078173679 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988033373613 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169914867467 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.