Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
A debate on whether people who commit crimes should be sentenced to fixed punishments rages on. Some people are in favour of an exact punishment towards each type of crime, while others argue that other factors, such as motivation, circumstances of a specific crime should be considered. In my view, I contend that other related information also plays a vital role in determining the punishment.
People who think that there should be a fixed punishment may worry about the unfairness, if a flexible punishment rule is introduced. With a flexible punishment setting, those who are in power could seek every method to reduce or even eliminate the punishment, just because they have more contacts in the government. However, poor people could hardly have the chance to do that. As a result, different people who commit the same crime may have different punishments, which is obviously unfair.
However, others dispute that background information, including motivation of the criminal, is complex and the judge should not overlook it when deciding the punishment. For example, many car crashes which lead to the death of some innocent people are beyond the control of drivers, as it may relate to some mechanical issues of vehicles. Under such a circumstance, although the accident has caused the death, the driver should not be punished severely, because these are accidentally tragedies.
In my own view, the punishment to a criminal should be based on a mixed types of materials. Related government departments like the police department need to investigate thoroughly about every criminal case. For example, if the investigation shows that the culprit has a good reputation in the community and it is the only crime he or she commits, a less serious punishment should be considered in order to give the criminal a chance to correct wrong behaviours. Only in this way, our society will create a more harmonious place to live.
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- The following appeared as part of a newspaper editorial Two years ago Nova High School began to use interactive computer instruction in three academic subjects The school dropout rate declined immediately and last year s graduates have reported some impre 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum issued by a large city's council on the arts:"In a recent citywide poll, 15 percent more residents said that they watch television programs about the visual arts than was the case in a poll conducted five years ago. 60
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- TPO-9:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'type'?
Suggestion: type
...o a criminal should be based on a mixed types of materials. Related government depart...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: CHANCE_CHANGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...sidered in order to give the criminal a chance to correct wrong behaviours. Only in th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90677525853 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0330525148 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379927394003 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120282382022 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102415392736 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218586826605 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763680906664 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.