As people rely more on technology to solve problems ,the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate .
Discuss the extent upto which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take .In supporting your posititon consider in which ways the statement may or may not hold true and explain how these considerations shaped your opinion .
Technology is an inseperable and significant part of our lives in the modern world. One cannot simply demur the impact of technology in our day to day lives. Human beings have evolved over time and the technical developments that we see around us is a concrete evidence of it. Starting from simple tasks such as performing math calculations to simplification of human efforts using artificial intelligence are arbitrary instances to depict the massive impact of technology in our daily lives. The aid that has been offered to us due to regular advancements in technology have in turn kept us wanting for more. One advancement after another have been a cyclic process in the technological development. Man's thirst for simplifying petty tasks has been the necessity that has fuelled these advancements. Amidst all those tech enthusiastic thoughts that we have garnered over time there still lurks a burning question that has presented me an opportunity to explain and answer it satisfactorily.
It would be unfair to say that technological development have deteriorated a human's thinking capability. My stand on this notion comes from experiences and examples that all of us have seen around us although only few have carefully paid attention to it. For instance, few critics would maintain that calculator has deteriorated our computational skills, social networking has degraded our communication skills and also maybe that movies have degraded our reading skills. But what most fail to notice is that it has created great room of opportunities in the field of digital design, communication and have rather ameliorated our thinking abilities. We explored ideas of quicker communication that took us from letters to e-mails and then we thought that real time communication holds a greater effect that took us further into the features of video calling and voice chats. Technology has thus made our minds explore new possibilities to carry out our tasks.
Additionally, I would like to present another instance to maintain my stand on this notion. Technology has taught us the way to arrive at solution for the most complex problems, not by its efficacy but by our own thinking ability. For instance one has forgotten the way to reach his relative's home it would have been an issue of concern over a decade ago due to the possible risks. But now we can immediately make a call, ping our location, track our relative's home using google maps and even book a cab at reasonable price to reach their place directly. We can go a step further and do all the previously mentioned tasks. This wouldnt have been possible unless one had a thought process that was extremely sedulous. For example we could end up wrong directions, not keep track of the travel fare and so on. Thus technology has also caused us to become more chary and calculative.
Due to the above mentioned instances that all of us have practically experienced in our day to day lives I have arrived at the conclusion that advancements in technology have actually ameliorated our thinking abilities and not deteriorated it. The impact of my decisive conclusion is the reason you are able to track opinion of a wide range of people like me and also it is the reason for possibly being able to view it compactly on any device at any point of time. That thought process in itself have impacted the hardware of smartphones and the softwares of cloud computing. Thus, communication to artificial intelligence to booking movie tickets have made our lives more byzantine if we even humorously consider the wide variety of passwords and usernames that we have created for access to all those utilities. I think our task completion without which we just cannot imagine our life is attributed to the thinking ability of all of us to which technology has played a consistent supporting role. The bottomline of advancements in technology or whatsoever is attributed to necessity and necessity enables thinking and technology in turn supports it.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- As people rely more on technology to solve problems ,the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate .Discuss the extent upto which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take .In sup 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...husiastic thoughts that we have garnered over time there still lurks a burning qu...
^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a human' or simply 'humans'?
Suggestion: a human; humans
...nological development have deteriorated a humans thinking capability. My stand on this n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ll the previously mentioned tasks. This wouldnt have been possible unless one had a tho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 809, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eep track of the travel fare and so on. Thus technology has also caused us to become...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, still, then, thus, as for, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 85.0 33.0505617978 257% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3336.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 663.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03167420814 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07432619952 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97066548705 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 325.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1082.7 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9658241196 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6785714286 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128419292797 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040511667934 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345905591983 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905056517914 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326613569759 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.