UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002
The diagram indicates how many minutes was spent on three different call types in Britain, local, national/ international and mobiles, respectively over the 8 years from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, the popularity of local call type among people did not significant changed in the given time-frame, whereas spending time on national, international as well as mobile calls increased significantly over the period.
One type of fixed line call which is called local type, showed around 70 billion minutes call time in the 1995. In the next 4 years this number rose and reached a peak, 90 billion minutes in 1999, after this growth a dramatic decrease was observed until the end of period.
On the other hand, at the beginning of the period another fixed line, national/ international call time was calculated as 37 billion minutes, this number started to rise year by year and stopped, approximately, at 60 billion minutes in 2002. Likewise, mobile calls showed a dramatic increment in the given timescale, from 1 billion minutes to 45 billion minutes.
- Main reasons for migration to from the UK 2007 73
- CONSUMPTION OF SPREADS 78
- Hours of leisure time per year in Someland 85
- Write an email or a letter a new penfriend in another country 66
- Many young people leaving school think that going to university will give them higher wages, superior career prospects and greater job satisfaction. However, they would be better to get a job and start earning as soon as possible.Do your agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased significantly over the period. One type of fixed line call which is cal...
^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... billion minutes to 45 billion minutes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11046511628 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78940740521 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2127806937 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166261289032 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951597967162 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066555145931 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113690582903 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324597021116 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.