The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the usage of four types of food was fluctuate. In addition, the expenditure on fish was the lowest all the time surveyed.
As can be seen from the graph, the number of people consumed beef was about 220 grams in 1979,. This figures for chicken and lamb were lower, at around 140 grams for the former and exactly 150 grams for the latter and fish was the least favorite food, at only 55 grams per person per week.
Over the period, the country witnessed a dramatically decrease in the consumption of beef, lamb and fish in 2004, at approximately 110 grams, 60 grams and 45 grams respectively. By contrast, chicken usage increased significantly from just 140 grams to around 240 grams, a rise of 100 grams
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-20 | Sunny Nguyen | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...ll, the usage of four types of food was fluctuate. In addition, the expenditure on fish w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... Over the period, the country witnessed a dramatically decrease in the consumption of beef, lamb and fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to around 240 grams, a rise of 100 grams
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 687.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61073825503 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54688922918 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1891547554 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13661460398 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773772936919 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109268123499 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115214373314 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126608748798 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.