The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different ages from 1973 to 2008
The line graph compares the rate of birth in 6 distinctive women age groups in Britain in the years between 1973 and 2008.
It is clear from the given chart that there was an upward trend in the birth rate for British women from 30 to 39 years old, while the other women age groups saw a reverse tendency. 25 to 29 years old females had by far the highest birth rate during the time period.
In 1973, about 140 infants were born per 1000 people from women aged from 25 to 29, followed by some fluctuations until it had reached around 120 by the year of 2008. Similarly, women between 20 and 25 and under 20 also seemed to gave birth to fewer children over 35 years, from approximately 125 and 60 birth per 1000 residents to just 95 and 40, respectively in the final year surveyed. The number was much lowest for birth rate of females aged over 40 years old, where it droped by 10 birth to just 10 per 1000 people in 2008.
On the other hand, the figures for birth rate of British women from 30 to 35 and 35 to 39 years old witnessed an increase throughout the period of 35 years by 10 and 20 birth to over 80 and 65 per 1000 inhabitants, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-10 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
| 2017-02-10 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- the charge shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 78
- Some people believe that people have the right to university education and government should make it free no matter what their financial background To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22972972973 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25826674412 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3629981684 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303934944203 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176875367665 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847877560659 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22990706284 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820260129116 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.85 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.