Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement presented is little too extreme. Denying funding for arts completely will result in stagnation of growth of new artists. Art is an integral part of any society and culture therefore it is necessary that government should consider rationing some funding for growth of art and artists as well. It is true that when people are hungry and unemployed directing all the resources to their welfare makes more sense. But for any country suffering from such circumstances, maintaining a good balance in fulfilling its citizens need and appreciating the homegrown talent are of tantamount importance. Several reasons can be provided to support puporting such approach.
To begin with, the need of the citizens is of the utmost importance for any country especially when there is dearth of consitent meals and basic living facilities like job and home. But it is not viable for any nation to allocate the expenses aimed only to alleviate these problems. All governments keep this in mind while rationing their budgets. Giving equitable opportunity is the prime goal here. Expenses have to be divided to ensure national security, education, law enforcement, sports, global recogniztion and arts as well, and these are only a few of the complete list. Growth is significant when each and every one is able to grow.
Additionally, arts can also prove to be a significant source of income. Many roman, greek and chinese cities still attract a lot of international tourists who like to be mesmerized by the art incorporated and preserved in buildings and mueseums of these cities. And only the welfare of citizen of any country does not warrant the recognition on global level, take for example the middle east countries. Because of their natural resources the citizens of these countries live in affluent conditions but these countries are not idealized by any nation. Instead the country which has dexterously managed to improve its wealth as well as skills like Germany, England, China and United States are idealized by other nations.
Moreover, the combination that provides and gurantees that as long as possible, people's needs will be considered first and then an impartial funding will be provided to the developement of skills in field of art sounds way more solid as compared to the statement present.
However, certain extreme circumstance like femine, war and natural disastours are an expection. Countries facing such difficult situations can consider denying funding for any cause that might seem prodigal in such situations.
Conclusively, it is good to have not major but some amount of resources allocated to upbringing the talent residing in any country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-05 | AnubhavGuha | 83 | view |
- Today, more and more students are deciding to move a different country for highier studies.Do you thinkthat the benefits of this outweigh the problems. 73
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 16
- You want to sell your television. You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you. Write a letter to your friend.In your letter:Explain why you are selling the television.Describe the television.Suggest a date when your friend can come and see i 73
- Claim: Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students.Reason: College students—like people in general—prefer to follow directions rather than make their own 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed only to alleviate these problems. All governments keep this in mind while rati...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al security, education, law enforcement, sports, global recogniztion and arts as ...
^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...mplete list. Growth is significant when each and every one is able to grow. Additionally, arts ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ntries are not idealized by any nation. Instead the country which has dexterously manag...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23201856148 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84932963666 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556844547564 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7294969805 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.380952381 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167766504443 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472243260767 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032807064554 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738035939773 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567767896876 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.