The spread of multinational companies and the increase in globalization produce positive effects for everyone. Do you agree or disagree?
it is certainly true that in recent decades the trend of free trade and spread of multinational companies has been escalated. The question is whether these measures would be beneficial to society or it may harm. As such I completely agree that international business need to be promoting in entire world uniformly. This is be shown by looking at how job creation and economical stability by liberated trade.
For one, cosmopolitan companies have to extend in different countries to generate new jobs to the local community. Take India, for example. Before ten years India was confined to local business and they were not well come to foreign groups, till that point their economy was immovable and less chances of employment to the populace but after the introduction of multinational companies their economy boost up and turned out to be a Asian tiger. Thus, as can be clearly seen from my example there is a need of to promote globalization.
Another benefit of open trade and introduction of multinational companies is that indeed it propagates the competition among local and foreign brand and truly develop the market. In addition to this people would acquire more benefits in terms of quality product and various varieties.
Native businessmen oppose the open trade and invasion of multinational companies in different nation because it would destroy the native orthodox culture , tradition and put local industries in jeopardy. However evidence proved that it expand the financial capability. Therefore I reiterate my opinion in favor globalization.
In conclusion, after looking at how importants of job apportunities and econmical stability of an individual country. It has proven that world organization need to promote free trade and equal distribution
Sentence: Before ten years India was confined to local business and they were not well come to foreign groups, till that point their economy was immovable and less chances of employment to the populace but after the introduction of multinational companies their economy boost up and turned out to be a Asian tiger.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, proper
Suggestion: Refer to years and India
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by a determiner, possessive
Suggestion: Refer to point and their
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a determiner, possessive
Suggestion: Refer to companies and their
Sentence: Thus, as can be clearly seen from my example there is a need of to promote globalization.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by an infinitival to
Suggestion: Refer to of and to
Sentence: In addition to this people would acquire more benefits in terms of quality product and various varieties.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and people
Sentence: However evidence proved that it expand the financial capability.
Description: The fragment it expand the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace expand with verb, past tense
Sentence: In conclusion, after looking at how importants of job apportunities and econmical stability of an individual country.
Error: importants Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: apportunities Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: econmical Suggestion: economical
You first step, try to put 350 words. You have the potential to get 7.0 or more.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 280 350
No. of Characters: 1459 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.091 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.211 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.979 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.873 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.557 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.006 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5