The following appeared as part of the petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group.
“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the land will be sold to Smith, the proposed development will have disastrous consequences for our area. The company plans to build a small hotel on the land. Although they have promised to ensure the preservation of the sanctuary, there is no way that their plans will do anything but harm the sanctuary. There are no circumstances under which this sale will benefit our community, which relies on tourists who visit.
For thousands of years, human beings have been living off the land. Up until the industrial revolution the impact of humans on the environment had been sustainable. Humans were able to coexisted with other species in a peaceful way. In the last hundred years, humans have begun developing and redesigning the surface of our planet in a way that negatively impacts the animals, the environment, and the planet as a whole. Environmental activists and construction companies have battled over the preservation of nature of some time, and the negative impacts it may have on our planet.
The resident states that the bird population will decrease as a result of the hotel being built. Conversely, the company states that the building will be erected on a small portion of the land that would minimally affect the bird ecosystem. The residents did not have any evidence to support their claim of the decreasing bird population, they simply state their opinion that the building will lead to the sanctuary's destruction. It can't simply be stated that the hotel would lead to the destruction of the bird population without extensive research on the area and the local birds themselves.
Another negative impact claimed by the residents is the tourism traffic that the birds bring. Again, this brings the argument back to the fallacy that the hotel would bring destruction to the sanctuary. With the hotel being on the Wildlife Preserve the hotel may actually bring more tourism and give those tourists a place to stay and observe the wildlife up close. The residents of the community fail to analyze the benefits of the hotel stating, "...there is no way that their plans will do anything but harm the sanctuary."
The company claims that their hotel will preserve the area, but the residents offer no comments or explanations on how the company plans to do those things. Without this information, a decision can not be made about protecting the wildlife within the preserve. The company's side must be understood and evaluated by the general population before signing a petition, a rash decision against the hotel.
Wildlife preservation in important to the planet and ecosystems everywhere. Biodiversity ensures a rich community of thriving wildlife that can be easily destroyed by meddling humans. The 300 bird species that the residents are concerned about deserve protection, and with communication and cooperation between the two groups a decision can be made that satisfies the needs of the wildlife preserve and encourages economic growth within the Youngtown community.
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.Write a 66
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 66
- sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid, we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 83
- The following appeared as part of the petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group.“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a peaceful way" with adverb for "peaceful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...re able to coexisted with other species in a peaceful way. In the last hundred years, humans have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... lead to the sanctuarys destruction. It cant simply be stated that the hotel would l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
... lead to the sanctuarys destruction. It cant simply be stated that the hotel would l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, if, may, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 418.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2009569378 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86077991467 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.799875287 57.8364921388 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.777777778 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.70786347227 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145778550918 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474225058365 0.0743258471296 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363817024791 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807106732589 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270554064692 0.0628817314937 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 98.500998004 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.