the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant
the graph illustrates information about the proportion of people who employed in three different sectors in UK, over a ten-year period between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out is that there were considerable increases in both of private sector and self-employed sector, whereas people who worked in public sector saw a substantial fall. Another interesting point is that in 2000, public sector had the highest proportion but in 2010, the figure of private sector was higher than the others.
In terms of self-employed sector, it began at almost 20% in 2000 and the rose slightly at 20% in 2005 before saw a considerable upward trend, reached a pick at 30% in 2010. Likewise, approximately 40% of people worked in private sector in the first year, after that the figure flutuated and increased to a high of just over 50% in 2010.
In contrast, public sector accounted for nearly 50% of the employees in 2000. Then, there was a dramatical decrease to low of 20% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | amfeja | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 91 | view |
- the chart below shows the most popular films by genre for men and women and general ticket sales for different types of film in the USA in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- Internet users as percentage of population. 78
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV 52
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the graph illustrates information about the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86826347305 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76559853645 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.325579569 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216283740863 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106443044597 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668109011154 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147844187812 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670593794947 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.