Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
Knowing about the past is always beneficial but it should not be given utmost importance when we are making any decision today. History shows us many past consequences that may be prevalent in that social economic premises but may not be valid at present. It shows us many important decisions from the past and their result in that time. Those consequences increases our knowledge in present time without actually experiencing them but those should not me a dormant factor to influence present decision. Therefore I am agree with the reason given against the claim.
History always plays a role of good companion for human. From the beginning of civilization it logs all the events irrespective of whether it is important or not. If we thoroughly go through any selective part of the history then we have at least rough idea how the culture and social and economic condition were. But any decision taken at that time should not be replicated blindly in the present time. If replication does occur then the consequences will be different that were happened in history. Because the situation in every sectors are different from that time.
The same argument is valid for all sectors . It may be politics, business , education etc. All the sector will be affected if any past knowledge is replicated to make decision. It is common in politics to repeat the decision because it follow the legacy of that political party. But if the situation is different then it will serve no purpose at all.
For example the decision taken by American government during cold war should not be repeated in present time though the temporal situation may be same as at that time. Because if any decision is taken then it will seriously jeopardize modern stable relation between Russia and America. Consider another situation where a corporate company force to take pink slip to its employee when the economic condition of that company was at worst. Now that situation may be beneficial in the past but may not be in present. So if the company repeat the same decision again the result may be opposite.
Exact replication of any situation from the past is not possible . So clearly replication of any decision will not work either. Past knowledge will surely help them to understand the situation better but we have to apply that sagacity intelligently in the present. Then only the decision will be most appropriate according to the situation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-06 | aarkadatta | 66 | view |
2012-08-06 | shefali saxena | 55 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing. "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter tha 73
- 1 The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 84
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 76
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 60
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both. 66
Sentence: Those consequences increases our knowledge in present time without actually experiencing them but those should not me a dormant factor to influence present decision.
Description: The fragment consequences increases our is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace increases with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Sentence: It is common in politics to repeat the decision because it follow the legacy of that political party.
Description: The fragment it follow the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace follow with verb, past tense
Sentence: So if the company repeat the same decision again the result may be opposite.
Description: The fragment company repeat the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace repeat with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Sentence Length SD: 5.784 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 409 350
No. of Characters: 1980 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.497 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.841 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.636 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.042 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.784 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5