Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nowadays, money is an integral part of our life and everybody chooses a particular profession in order to earn living. But of course, the holders of different professions have quite various incomes. That brings up a very intriguing question: ‘is the earned money is adequate to the difficulty and importance of the work?’ Some people think several workers such as nurses, teachers and doctors are underestimated while actors, sportsmen and company bosses are exaggerated in term of the salaries. I agree with this opinion and I will try to support my point of view below.
It is clear that, edu...
- The chart below shows the estimated sales nationally of silver goods in 000s of units for two companies next year The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in silver goods at the end of next year Write a report for a university l 91
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is reused Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 90
- The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 90
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 77
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Characters: 1463 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.179 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.797 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.688 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.814 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5