The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Given are the charts providing clear information about the causes of worldwide land degradation and the effects of this process on certain regions for the period of 1990s.
A glance at the pie-chart reveals that the main reason of the damage of the land was considered over grazing made by cattle which indicates approximately 35 % and was marginally ahead of deforestation with the indicator of 30 %. Meanwhile, about two fifth of the world area became less productive due to over cultivation, followed by other activities which is 7 %.
Referring to the table it can also be noted that the majo...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-03 | Dhani Aristya | 63 | view |
| 2014-01-03 | cut muftia keumala | 73 | view |
| 2014-01-02 | naflaawfiyah | 60 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | orduhan | 73 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | qazzass | 40 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after construction of some tourist facilities. summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 80
- The graph below shows Houston Gold sales in millions of dollars in 2012. 87
- The chart below shows amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 68
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 997 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.941 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.78 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4