TPO21
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether genetic modification is a good process for plants or not. The reading says that this process has such positive points, be harder trees, be gained more economical benefits by producers and prevent overexploitation. However, the lecture refutes these reasons and says that this process has some serious problems.
First, trees are more intensify against the diseases. The reading states that the trees which have produced by genetic modification are more talent to survive. For example, in Hawaii, there is a new pest-resistent plants of papaya trees that can fight with virus infections that frequently damaged the native papya trees. In contrast, the professor claims that these trees that have produced by this process are only sufficient for some especial places and climates and if the region and climate change, all of them die down rapidly. Thus, they can not survive everywhere.
In addition, it has economical benefits for genetic modification trees' producers. According to the reading, these trees are more beneficial than ordinary trees due to they grow faster, give more yields of food, fruits and other products, then the farmers can obtain more product and as a result gain more benefit. However, the lecture refutes it by saying the farmers have to pay more money for planting these trees and so they pay much money relative to the benefit.
Finally, this process can help wild trees to prevent overexploitation. The passage states that the rate of destruction of wild trees is faster than the replacing process then these modification trees are the best option to replace them because of fast growth and high yield in given geographic conditions. On the other hand, the professor refutes it as well and poses that the trees which are modification type always want to compete with other plants in water, nutrients and so forth. Therefore, they may damage other species in this competition and this not a good solution.
In summary, against the statement of the reading, the lecture refutes all reasons to modify genetically trees and provides some opposite reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- TPO47 81
- travel inside or outside of a country 77
- Bee Nest 80
- Bees' Nest 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s such positive points, be harder trees, be gained more economical benefits by pr...
^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...oints, be harder trees, be gained more economical benefits by producers and prevent overe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...vive everywhere. In addition, it has economical benefits for genetic modification trees...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in contrast, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65084839755 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5128334374 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42722250652 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145040135918 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712297551573 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234393925149 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683287965673 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.