reducing working hours
It is stated in the reading passage that employees in the United States prefer to work four days a week instead of five days for less income. In addition to being favorable to employees, it would also benefit economy and companies themselves. However, the lecturer refutes these claims by bringing about cogent arguments.
First, neither economy nor companies would benefit from this idea; since the companies need to provide new employees with medical care insurances and also afford the costs for their training. So companies will end up not hiring new working force, but asking employees to work overtime and do the same amount of work as they would in advance do in five days. Consequently, the job would become unpleasant and joblessness won't decrease. This contradicts with the author's argument in the reading.
Second, life quality of the employees will not improve; The reverse might occur inasmuch as working less would decrease life quality of employees and hinder their chance for professional advances. Moreover, they may either lose their jobs due to economical downturn or strive so hard for promotion to a five day per week job to be the manager of employees who work four days a week.
Overall, this new policy will have a negative impact on economy, companies, and individuals.
- TPO6_Integrated Writing 3
- TPO 1: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support 66
- TPO 04_ Integrated task 83
- TPO5_ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 06_ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ont decrease. This contradicts with the authors argument in the reading. Second, lif...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11214953271 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60633747266 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616822429907 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5604588587 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106066038135 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371913708641 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569643421151 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574697108061 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379767419832 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.