This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5000 couples.
The given chart shows the information about the number of honeymooners who chose a destination among the top eight honeymoon venues in British in 2010.
Overall, Thailand was the most popular destination for newlywed couples, while the bottom of the list was The lake district.
Thailand was the number-one destination, with 1410 couples choosing this, making it slight more popular than Bali, at 1335 couples. The third popular venue was Costa Rica, with 750 couples spending their honeymoon there, which was around one third higher than the number of newlywed couples coming The Greek Islands, at 432.
Paris was next at 209, while Spain was slightly less popular at 140 couples. And this was followed by The Lake district, at 124.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-22 | Huyen Trang | 70 | view |
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 72
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 67
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 43.0788530466 9% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 52.1666666667 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 616.0 1977.66487455 31% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 121.0 407.700716846 30% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.31662479036 4.48103885553 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41687146389 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 212.727598566 37% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652892561983 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 171.0 618.680645161 28% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6003584229 29% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5023894249 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210216008861 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107003206874 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699861321076 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134414812332 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716344294169 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 86.8835125448 30% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.