TPO21
The author mentions some benefits of genetically modified trees over natural trees to indicate that they are reasonable option for different trees. The lecturer concedes some suggested benefits of modified trees, but he believes that they merits are not as well as they may sound. He refutes the aforementioned arguments and offers some counterclaims.
First, according to the passage, due to the feature of the trees which are hard, they are most likely able to survive under cumbersome circumstances like virus infections. On the contrary, the professor admits the statement to some degree. He also adds that they may be influenced by other diverse conditions in spite of their resistance against some terrible circumstances. For instance, a tree may be designed to survive in front of many harsh climates, but if the climate alters in the future, it would not have the capability of being survive anymore. Moreover, distinct trees are better adapted to various conditions.
Second, the genetically modified trees provide the farmers with more benefits since their products, including fruits, and wood are by far more than natural trees, so they are more economical. Conversely, the speaker points out to the fact that other aspects should be considered. He speculates that it has some hidden costs, on the grounds that every time the farmers want to plant those trees, they have to but its seeds which are expensive.
Finally, based on the reading, the genetically modified trees can answer human demands for woods. Furthermore, it help the areas in which many tree species are in danger. Nevertheless, the lecturer alludes to the point that their growth is aggressive, and they may damage other types of trees in the habitat. As a matter of fact, they out-compete with other indigenous plants in that region, and they can consume their resources such as soil nutrients and water. Therefore, it is plausible that other plants endanger and disappear after some time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
- teachers have a higher effect on students rather than their friends 76
- Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class 73
- TPO20 76
- Some people believe that the media for example television radio newspapers or Internet news sources are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past These people argue that the media today often present incorrect infor 97
- TPO22 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'merit'
Suggestion: merit
...dified trees, but he believes that they merits are not as well as they may sound. He r...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...uman demands for woods. Furthermore, it help the areas in which many tree species ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72797286231 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553125 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4556754157 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390605977033 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123804409004 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992833183097 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245219447757 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223050525069 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.