do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
it is more important to keep you old friends than it is to make new friends.
use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the modern era which is often named information age, communication became more and more complicated. due to this complexity, human beings are able to make new connections and friendships through different tasks they do every day. A question which is often raised regarding this subject is whether keeping old friends takes precedence over making new ones or not. As it is a moot point, there might not be a general agreement on this topic; however, personally, I rest on the belief that it is crucial for one to stay connected with his old friends. In the following, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons to delineate my perspective.
the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that, trust is the most priceless advantage that lead one to be in touch with an individual. Broadly speaking, with the passage of time, a boundary of trust is built between two friends that is somehow unimaginable with new people. To elucidate more, throughout everyone's life, there are some embarrassing situations which they need to be shared with a reliable person and an old friend is the first option that comes to the mind. To shed more light on this topic, one can refer to some studies in psychology corroborating the amount of time a friendship lasts has a positive correlation with the intimacy and trust both-side feel.
Also, it cannot go unnoticed that, as human beings grow older it gets harder for them to communicate with new people. On the other hand, in the young ages there are abundant opportunities to become familiar with people and built a friendship than there is in adolescent. Another reason that could be taken into consideration is the fact that in adolescent the personality is well-developed and it does not get accustomed to other personality as easy as before in their young ages. However, there might be some exceptions and these are some people that their characters are analogous, but they happened to meet each other in adolescent.
In the light of the reasons explained, I am on conviction that it is crucial to be in touch with old friends, because not only they are more reliable, but also it is much easier than making new friends which may bother you with their personality. Consequently, it is highly recommended for people to maintain the relationships with their old friends whom they proved to be in the hardest time of one’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...ation became more and more complicated. due to this complexity, human beings are ab...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...reasons to delineate my perspective. the first exquisite point to be mentioned i...
^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d an old friend is the first option that comes to the mind. To shed more light on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, well, broadly speaking, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87684729064 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8500761938 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524630541872 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0666666667 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210725079693 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734110662725 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624123774278 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139544055873 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663390687217 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.