You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie charts compare the proportions of electricity production by five different sources of fuel in two countries in the years 1980 and 2000.
It is noticeable that the units of natural gas in both countries fell, while the units of coal and nuclear power accounted for the largest proportions of fuel sources in Australia and France, respectively. Also, France used more oil than Australia.
In Australia, coal accounted for 50% of sources in 1980, rising to just over three quarters in 2000. By contrast, nuclear power, which was almost 75%, was the most popular fuel sources in France in 2000.
Both countries saw a decrease in electricity production using natural gas, from 20 units to 2 units in Australia and from 25 units to 2 units in France. On the other hand, oil in France is more common than those in Australia. In fact, in 2000, Australia used oil only two units, whereas France used oil up to 25 units. Finally, hydro power grew by 16 units in Australia but dropped by three units in France.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons w 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons w 56
- Writing task 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in theworkplace. Others think that the true function of a unive 78
- Writing task 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a univ 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, whereas, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75706214689 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56953475509 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8427263102 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253149987862 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113226486856 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524334737423 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17166479598 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407701249308 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.