The following appeared in a newspaper editorial:
"As violence in movies increases, so do crime rates in our cities. To combat this problem we must establish a board to censor certain movies, or we must limit admission to persons over 21 years of age. Apparently our legislators are not concerned about this issue since a bill calling for such actions recently failed to receive a majority vote."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Write the essay now!
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
Tue, 07/25/2017 - 22:15 | ShivaniPatel | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the publisher to the staff of The Clarion, a large metropolitan newspaper:"During the recent campaign for mayor, a clear majority of city readers who respo 100
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the assistant manager of Pageturner Books:"Over the past two years, Pageturner's profits have decreased by 5 percent, even though we have added a popular c
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a River City newspaper:"The Clio Development Group's plan for a multilevel parking garage on Dock Street should be approved in order to strengthen
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a local newspaper:"It makes no sense that in most places 15-year-olds are not eligible for their driver's license while people who are far
- The following appeared as part of an article in a popular arts-and-leisure magazine:"The safety codes governing the construction of public buildings are becoming far too strict. The surest way for ar