tpo integrated 28
The lecture and the reading both discuss if Robert Peary reaches the pole or not. While the reading states that Peary reached the pole and enumerates three reasons of support, the lecture refutes this, saying that there were no solid evidence and the reasons mentioned in the reading were not convenient.
first of all, the reading claims that investigation of peary record that he reached the pole. However the lecture argues that the investigations are not completely objective. Furthermore, the professor states that the people who did the investigations were Peary friends. They contributed some money to do the investigations Moreover, the investigations were done in 2 days, the investigations were biased.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that Tom Avery made the same trek in less than 37 days, and that prove that peary trip was true and he reached the pole. The lecture counters this point by stating that the two trips were totally different. The weather condition during Avery trip was better than Peary trip. According to the professor Avery did not take any food or heavy materials with him on his slit.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that some photographs support the claims that surf position of the sun at the pole during Peary trip was the same as the surf position of today’s sun. the lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that the photographs are not a prove that Peary reached the pole. Moreover, the photographs were not established the sun. they were shaded and worn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- tpo integrated 34 60
- it is better to have a a tour guide while you are traveling 60
- TPO INTEGRATED 33 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 73
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the reading were not convenient. first of all, the reading claims that in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...e reading were not convenient. first of all, the reading claims that investi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... peary record that he reached the pole. However the lecture argues that the investigati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...t the people who did the investigations were Peary friends. They contributed some mo...
^^^^
Line 10, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the surf position of today's sun. the lecture refutes this claim by pointing ...
^^^
Line 10, column 268, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...inting out that the photographs are not a prove that Peary reached the pole. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...otographs were not established the sun. they were shaded and worn.
^^^^
Line 10, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed the sun. they were shaded and worn.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06324110672 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65390811748 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482213438735 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6386581972 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401267725558 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153583003906 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126474451651 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261060683004 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667284386844 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.