It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you.

Essay topics:

It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you.

Submitted by doships96 on Mon, 08/21/2017 - 13:39

In my opinion marrying with someone has different mentality or thinking is a better option. Partners with similar thinking or opinion won't be able to find or discover the errors or mistakes, as both have similar view for some thing. If both the partners have different thinking process they would access the view from different angle and different prospective and thus would be able look over broader area of any problem or plan. Any solution or plan can be improved and made better when more than one brains have different thinking working on it.

As described above, marrying with someone who is different from you helps to get better solutions and plans. For example, considering a couple who are discussing to buy a house for their future. The man here would think that the house should be near to school, market, hospital and office while the women here would think where the should be located(the area), how many bed rooms, the interior of house, and the most important thing, the future development of that area in terms of monetary value.

Continuing the above discussion, here is a real time example. As I cleared my secondary classes I had to get transfered to higher secondary class in a different branch of school which was too much far away from home. My father decided to buy in a house in a locality which was in north to the school, but the area was surrounded by many slums and developing sites, and the costing was also less. On the other hand my mother found a house located some what far from school but, the area was well developed and had all the facility including my classes which was a plus point. So incase if both were similar then in future I would have need to ride more for classes.

So, considering above given explanation I disagree with the given statement. Also marrying someone who is similar to oneself would never help in exploring the same topic from view and the vulnerable mistake would remain unexplored or unsolved.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-13 Greene_Fielder 61 view
2019-08-23 dasepular 70 view
2019-08-22 dasepular 76 view
2019-04-18 ankitapatel 70 view
2017-12-31 photoadesh 60 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...mistakes, as both have similar view for some thing. If both the partners have different th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iscussion, here is a real time example. As I cleared my secondary classes I had to...
^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: SOME_WHAT_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhat' (=slightly)?
Suggestion: somewhat
...er hand my mother found a house located some what far from school but, the area was well ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n I disagree with the given statement. Also marrying someone who is similar to ones...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71220930233 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42874210165 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531976744186 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1680939239 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241517971613 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939582013279 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125788023525 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148674988891 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656316206771 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.