some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Should government fund arts or not? There are those who claim that allocating finances to arts is undesirable and ever reproachable. Although this prospect has some merits, I disagree with it due to the reasons that will be discussed in detail below.
To begin with, those who state that artists need not be supported aver that artistic workmanship is futile and even useless and those resources that devoted to the art might have been used on dealing with other issues. To illustrate, France government has been spending billions of euros on buttressing artists in recent years and many point out ...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-17 | divyadr93 | 56 | view |
2019-08-20 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-06-09 | Arun revanth | 61 | view |
2019-05-20 | marasheed1763@gmail.com | 56 | view |
2019-03-13 | RAndrewRubesh | 73 | view |
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 50
- Some people think that sport teaches children how to compete while others believe that children learn team work Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 76
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 70
- Essay topics: TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
that will be discussed in detail below.
that will be discussed in details below.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 346 350
No. of Characters: 1688 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.313 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.879 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.739 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.138 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.592 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Yes, you are on the right
Yes, you are on the right track of IELTS task II. Just keep on going.
for task I, don't need to make your own stories, simply follow the requirements asked. and don't use pronouns like: 'I, you'....too much, you should be Okay. Submit more task I essays and we will see.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ited resources but it appears that their work plays an important and even vital r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01156069364 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80659500262 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56936416185 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4435209173 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155126447945 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541504112053 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416565436074 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930951133275 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045608556792 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.