The graph shows the usage of four different types of transport in Metropolis from 1985 to 2010.Write a report on this chart,describing its main features and comparing and contrasting where appropriate.
The line graph illustrates changes in four method of travel in Metropolis between 1985 and 2010. General speaking, it can be seen that the use of public transport dramatically increased , while private car usage declined steadily.
The use of light rail and bus was approximately the same at around at 5 million trips in 1985. In 1990 light rail usage was a dramatic increase t reach approximately 7,5 million trips by 2000. By 2010, this was the most popular form of transportation at just over 8 million trips .Usage of buses remained steadily at 5,3 million trips from 1990 and 2000. But in 2000, this started to grow to a high of just over 7 million trips.In 1985, private car was the most popular transportation in Metropolis at just over 6 million trips. However, this declined steadily between 1990 and 2010 to under 6 million trips. Motorbike usage increased sharply form about 3,5 million trips in 1985 to just under 4 million trips in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-15 | namhero1997vn | 58 | view |
- Pie chart Topic Time spent on leisure activities by men and women between the age of 21 and 40 in the US 77
- the diagram below shows the process of milk production 69
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 100
- The graph shows the usage of four different types of transport in Metropolis from 1985 to 2010 Write a report on this chart describing its main features and comparing and contrasting where appropriate 58
- The chat below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, 2015 and future projection of 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates changes in fo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... public transport dramatically increased , while private car usage declined steadi...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e private car usage declined steadily. The use of light rail and bus was approx...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nsportation at just over 8 million trips .Usage of buses remained steadily at 5,3 ...
^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Usage
...portation at just over 8 million trips .Usage of buses remained steadily at 5,3 milli...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... to a high of just over 7 million trips.In 1985, private car was the most popular ...
^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost popular transportation in Metropolis at just over 6 million trips. However, t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to just under 4 million trips in 2010.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77575757576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69006764376 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2352194812 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146815424716 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814245828663 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487528468802 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136652740179 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285499037493 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.