People don’t read newspapers or watch tv news but they rely on internet for news. Is that positive or negative development?
Nowadays, due to mobile revolution people find easy to read the news through internet instead of watching television news channels or reading through newspapers. They also feel it is convenient to read the news while travelling which saves their time in leaps and bounds. In the following passage, I will explain the causes for this change and conclude whether it is a positive or negative sign.
Do people find time watching the news on television? No. Most of them are engaged with hectic work schedule, in such circumstances they cannot afford to see the news in same place for hours. Moreover, people feel more number advertisements create nuisance for the viewers. Over the years, news channels to increase their viewers base they manipulate news to make it more interesting. For instance, the death of Ms. Jambalaya is creating lots of political conspiracy, most of the news channels have their own versions to make it more interesting, to spike their viewers. Therefore, the too much commercialization and false information are frustrating viewers to watch the news channels.
Furthermore, many newspapers have increased their price frequently. In addition, they contain more number commercial pages which enable people to think to buy or not. For example, the Hindu news prints has increased their Sunday edition to 12, where many youngsters are hesitant to buy. Additionally, easy internet access helps people to read news through mobile applications instantly at low price. Thus, it is believed, regular price revision and internet revolution are the major cause for this change.
To sum up, as the proverb says, “time is gold”. People feel it is not worth to watch or read news through television and news prints, which is easily available on mobile news applications. But this trend is not good for the country, which affects youngsters reading skill drastically, also their language skill will be spoiled by such huge transformation and this considered to be a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-17 | harjeetsingh | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write a 11
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and business to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Does the advantage of this trend outweigh the disadvantage? 80
- Music should be taught in school along with other subjects like computer and science Do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing Why is this happen What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
... place for hours. Moreover, people feel more number advertisements create nuisance for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
...e frequently. In addition, they contain more number commercial pages which enable people to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24534161491 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90070923031 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549689440994 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5865296264 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3529411765 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415543439439 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13322796347 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722025119319 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265314224163 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460925717149 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.