Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
A company should give it's employees compensation on the basis of their work performance and merit rather than on the basis of number of years served. It's assumed it is a better way to encourage higher productivity.
Definitely, this is good for a company and even economic health of a country. A company giving compensation solely on the basis of their work performance will make employees work harder for the company. A higher productive employees will increase the profits for the company. It has other benefits as this will make most of employees hard working. A hard working nation progress faster towards economic dominance. Overall the economic condition of country would be good and it will be less prone to economic turmoil. The country of japan became a developed nation after it's citizen worked hard for many years. Most of japanese citizens are workaholic, they love to work hard at their nation. And Japan progressed without having any significant natural resource. They progressed just on it's human resource.
Additionally, as employees will be given credit on the basis of merit, many employees would love to have a higher education in their resume. A more educated candidate will have higher chance of performing better in the company as he can apply his expert knowledge gained during higher education. A more educated nation is also a good sign for overall growth of a nation. A country with higher number of educated people progress faster towards becoming superpower. The country of Singapore invested their initial funds for improvement of education system in their country. They didn't invested first in improving country infrastructure. And within few decades, the country transformed from one of the backward states to developed nation.
But there are some complication with the given recommendation. Many employees may work hard in initial years but may not be able to work hard at latter stage. People tend to loose vitality as they become old. This will be unfair to these employees as they deserve to have higher compensation. They should be paid higher because they have spent many years in the service for the company. New recruits will be getting higher compensation than old loyal employees.
Providing higher compensation on the basis of work performance and merit have few advantages like promoting hard work and education. But there are few negatives which should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Sruthi Bheemineni | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Shrija Sheth | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | fresky | 40 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Rakshick Shrinivas | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | abyz123 | 58 | view |
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.Discuss the extent to 50
- "The following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant:It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire city. 19,800 of them 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the employees') or simply say ''most employees''.
Suggestion: most of the employees; most employees
...It has other benefits as this will make most of employees hard working. A hard working nation pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...od sign for overall growth of a nation. A country with higher number of educated ...
^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...education system in their country. They didnt invested first in improving country inf...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...rk hard at latter stage. People tend to loose vitality as they become old. This will ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16243654822 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78509096547 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446700507614 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2840495075 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5925925926 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2962962963 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312263763587 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858422665116 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930951027498 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22008137368 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914589705035 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.