Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, information revulotion has become a controversial debate among people all around the world. Although mass communication are regarded as throuhjly both constructive and positive by a considerable number of people, there are a number of people hold an opponrnt's view. I am inclined to highly believe that mass communication is quite benefcial as they could help people to share their idea globaly. In thiss idea I will discuss both sides.
To begin with, there are several reasons why I support mass communication has a positive impact on people. First and foremost is that mass communication cause individual share their ideas more easily. Secondly, a large number of students and scientists are able to receive latest technology and researcher from another countries. Lastly, many thanks to information technology which led families to get in touch with their children who are leaving in abroad. Thus, there is no doubt that mass communication is a part of life of people in a daily basis.
However, there is no doubt that mass communication can provide people with various negative points. Mass communication can harm young children and people who are not used of this technology in approporiate ways. Ii is highly argued that this communication led to distroy the foundation of families in the third world countries. fore example, Harvard auniversity reaserher undertook a study to understand the relationship between children how uses new technolg more than two hours a day. The results revealed that higher use new information is negatively correlated with less productivity at schools. Hence, The more time spend on mass communication, the less productivity we will face.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my personal sentiment is that the benefits of mass communication far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-29 | Basil3241 | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | shivek | 100 | view |
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion? 77
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 85
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 77
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 85
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hare their ideas more easily. Secondly, a large number of students and scientists are able to rec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'receive the latest'.
Suggestion: receive the latest
... of students and scientists are able to receive latest technology and researcher from another ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fore
... families in the third world countries. fore example, Harvard auniversity reaserher ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thus, while, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30976430976 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06080422216 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.705431317 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5625 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153408510411 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537112514328 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367040582494 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931730016015 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256079213275 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.